Ecological
and Genetic Variation Among Channel Island and Mainland Native Grass Populations
Dr. Kristina Hufford
University of California, Santa Barbara
hufford@lifesci.ucsb.edu
Scientists have long recognized the role of islands as natural laboratories
for ecology and evolution (Darwin 1859). The distribution of populations within
and among islands and their mainland counterparts provides a unique opportunity
to evaluate ecological and evolutionary process that cause the adaptation of
organisms to their environment. In particular, the isolation of oceanic islands
results in two features of insular ecosystems that differ from the mainland:
1) a decreased overall number of species, and 2) an increased number of endemic
species (Simberloff 1974). These features are explained by the biased arrival
on islands of organisms with the ability to disperse long distances, and by the
diversification of successful immigrants into ecological niches that were unavailable
on the mainland (Carlquist 1974; Simberloff 1974).
Studies
of island biodiversity and the adaptive radiation of island organisms have traditionally
focused on large groups of taxa such as the Hawaiian silversword alliance (28
species in three genera; Carlquist 1970). Many of these studies include endemic
plants in efforts to examine speciation resulting from the adaptive specialization
of mainland organisms to island habitats (e.g. Ranker et al. 2000). However,
the adaptive evolution of organisms on islands may occur at a much more subtle
level – within a single species common to both island and mainland sites.
The adaptive evolution within populations of a single species results in different
races called ‘ecotypes’ and the formation of ecotypes is more likely
in common, widespread species than in rare or endemic species (Turresson 1936;
Krebs 1994).
Considerable evidence suggests that plants are adapted to local environmental
conditions (Bradshaw et al. 1984). Examples include metal tolerance of plants
that grow on mine tailings and herbicide resistance in weedy plants (Linhart
and Grant 1996). Given the geographic isolation of island populations, it is
likely these populations have diverged from one another over time (due to barriers
to interpopulation gene flow). If differences in the genetic structure and genetic
composition of plant populations are the result of adaptation to local environments,
then genetic variation among populations may be correlated with the ecological
characteristics of their habitats.
I propose
to examine the ecological and genetic variation of populations of three native
grass species on Santa Catalina Island (Nassella pulchra, Elymus glaucus, and
Bromus carinatus). I will compare data collected on Catalina with data from the
Channel Islands National Park and representative mainland sites in Santa Barbara
County. A unique combination of genetic analyses and ecological field studies
will allow me to address several questions concerning ecotypic variation of plants
distributed between island and mainland habitats. Namely, do island populations
of these species resemble mainland populations, or do they represent unique genetic
resources? If populations are genetically differentiated, are populations on
the same island more similar than on different islands? Similarly, are island
populations more similar to each other than mainland populations? Are populations
on different islands more distinct from each other than mainland populations
separated by similar distances due to stronger dispersal barriers between islands?
Does genetic variation correlate with ecological variables such as climate, soil
characteristics and rainfall? Finally, can I detect a genetic basis for morphological
variation among populations in a common garden study? These data will contribute
to knowledge of the genetic diversity of these native grasses, as well as contribute
to efforts in grassland restoration (Hufford and Mazer 2003).
|